I just can’t escape aspects of Rochester.

As I was leaving my final Social Psychology class, I was surprised by a familiar call.

kak, kak, kak, kak1

Two things happened. First, like Pavlov’s dog, I was gripped by an instinctual response: HIT THE FLOOR and watch the skies. Thankfully I only did the latter. Secondly, I was struck with the thought “I know I know that sound.” While I scanned the skies it hit me: a Peregrine Falcon.

But that was crazy. I knew there was a Cooper’s Hawk on campus. But a Peregrine? My mind must be playing tricks on me. Then suddenly there it was again:

kak, kak, kak, kak

And it wasn’t just me hearing it. Matt, another MAPP’er, walked up to me and said “there must be a hawk around here.” I resisted the urge to bird-geek out all over him.

Still there was nothing to be seen.

A couple hours pass. I decide to head over to the Pub, the campus bar, to work on my thesis. And that’s when I spot it: a bird passing overhead. I watch as it seems to “swim” over me using just the tips of it’s wings. Its a flight pattern I’ve seen countless times: a Peregrine Falcon. And a big one too (most likely female). It lands on the Rockerfeller Chapel2.

So I hightail it back to my car and pick up binoculars3. And sure enough, there it is, as clear as day. While it’s not Mariah (scroll down memory lane for a good shot or two of the falcons) or any of the Kodak kin, it’s nice to know that the species is here in Chicago as well.

Plus it’s getting me a little homesick.

1 – If you’re interested in the exact sound, or to see a Peregrine in action, check out a video I got a few years ago using a Kodak MC3 camera of Mariah, one of the Peregrines @ Kodak, here.

2 – It’s an ongoing UChicago joke that only a Rockerfeller would consider this a ‘chapel’

3 – Yes, I now carry binoculars in my car for just such situtations. I never intended to be a birder… I blame kodak.

Without a doubt Batman Begins is the big summer comic book movie. Marvel’s Fantastic Four (not the low budget Corman version… which may turn out to be a better movie), directed by the guy who did Barbershop will be a blip on the radar (let’s face it, The Incredibles has already done it better than they can ever hope to).

However, the award for the most concienciously adapted comic movie for the year, if not ever, will go to Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller’s Sin City. Adapted from Miller’s comics, this will be one of the most abmitous artistic projects of the year, not to mention one of the most star studded. Rumor is that they used Miller’s comic books as the direct story boards.

So my suggestion is check out the film noir, Chiaroscuro (an Italian cinema term for light and dark), inspired art and then watch this trailer (or if you’re feeling lazy, just keep the charater to the left in mind when you see Bruce Willis). All I can say is wow.

update (3/9): I’m apparently a visionary. Yahoo Movies just set up a site for Sin City that does a side by side art to image comparison. It’s pretty amazing… take a look.

Ok, it’s into the long haul now. I’m officially in the last two weeks of Q2. So communiques to waking-dreams are going to most likely drop a LOT. headnotes will most likely see more action as I’m working on my thesis proposal and tracking down a adviser (remember the scary linguistics course… I’m asking that professor today… be very afraid).

In the mean time I have a 20 page term paper to write, another 5-10 page final that’s yet to drop, 3 short response papers to write, and that social psych project to finish. Plus Drea will be visiting for a few days.

Sanity and sleep just left town.

Internet Bot
A bot is common parlance on the Internet for a software program that is a software agent. Bots interact with other network services intended for people as if it was a real person. One typical use of bots is to gather information. The term is derived from the word “robot”, reflecting the autonomous character in the “virtual robot”-ness of the concept.
(Wikipedia. Internet Bots. – 3/7/05)

Bot in reality is a pretty generic term covering a wide range of programs. Examples include:

  • Search engine bots – which crawl the internet databasing sites for engines like google. Also referred to as Spiders / Crawlers / etc. Best example of this is the famed Googlebot.
  • SPAM – Spam bots crawl webpages, discussion boards, usenet (does that even still exist?) and Chat gathering e-mail addresses for Spammers to use.
  • Games – Bots are used in a couple ways here:
    • massive(ly) multiplayer online role-playing game or MMORPG – Bots are used to allow players to continuously develop (level) characters at all hours of the day or night. Since leveling is related to repetitive tasks, they simply program their bot, throw the switch and walk away. This is illegal behavior in all games. To combat it the creators have implemented a series of anti-automation steps or Nerfing the game. These type of bots are often commoditized on places like e-bay
    • First person shooters – Have two types: Aimbots (used in shooter games to assist aiming) and ‘playerbots’ (which function as a teammate/partner player)
  • Personal Messaging – These bots play “human” simulating a chatter on Instant Messenger, Chatrooms and Discussion Boards. Often referred to as Chatter Bots.

I’ll be researching the Personal Messenger bot types.
Why this type? I’m particularly interested in the implications of machines that lead you to believe that they’re human. Chatterbots are typically scripted to vehimently deny the fact that you’re talking to a program
As to how did this grow out of the webcam research… gimmie a day for an explanation.

One of my theories is that Blogs replaced Life Cams (1:many broadcast cams like JennyCam) as an optimal performance method of sharing one’s day to day existance on the internet. As part of looking into this, I did a lexus/nexus study of the major media impressions for the phrases “Webcam” and “Blog”. The trends are pretty interesting. Note that webcams move into media decline in 2002 as blogs spike.

Also note that 2004 reports on blogging take a major jump. As the data shows a more than 2x jump on the back half of the year, I think it’s pretty safe to attribute this to election coverage. In particular, political blogs got a lot of coverage as a part of the Rather/CBS erronious Bush report. I expect that the number of media impressions in 2005 will be below these numbers.

Here’s a different view of the same data:

If you’re interested in toying with the data, here’s it in Excel format. Just let me know how you use it.